The Union government has officially responded, stating that it intends not to bring back the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) for central government employees now under the ambit of the National Pension System (NPS). This doesn’t go down well with many, but that in itself just shows the government’s incessant concern for managing pension costs responsibly and keeping away from financial burdens that are on a permanent basis.
What About The Unified Pension Scheme (UPS)?
In place of reviving OPS, the government, in January 2025, introduced the UPS, with the option to choose it given to all members of the NPS. The UPS is a defined benefit wherein any retiree who has served for at least 25 years is eligible to receive a pension equivalent to 50 percent of the average basic pay over the last year of service, proportionate for shorter services. UPS also provides death and invalidation benefits enhanced in some respects in comparison with those of OPS and, hence, close to OPS-like security but in a fiscally sound manner with a fully funded realization.
Why No Return To OPS
The OPS had offered a guarantee of pension, being 50% of the final salary, without any concern for employee contributions. Thus, over time, it became financially impossible because of increasing liabilities at the state and central level. Analysts, former central bankers, and economists have often cited OPS as a looming fiscal risk, particularly for states reintroducing it. In the eyes of the present government, a shift backward towards OPS would lead to intergenerational unfairness and shrink funding for critical services such as healthcare and education.
State-Level Pushback And Limitations
Several states attempted a restoration of OPS for their employees against the will of the Centre. They have also not been granted access to NPS funds for such action, making their attempt all the more difficult. Some states even moved to reclaim pensions corpus under NPS to support restoration of OPS-but the Centre has refused time and again while citing regulatory and legal constraints.
UPS: The Middle Path
While OPS is out of question for the central employee, UPS provides some middle ground: pension predictability, partly OPS-type benefits, and sustainability. But employees are wary, and the low uptake is indicative of many citing tax issues compared to walking the NPS way towards lesser flexibility. The last thing COPERS are to consider is whether or not UPS provides the stability they were hoping for without back-breaking fiscal demands.
Things That An Employee Should Know
For an employee under NPS of the central government, the message is very clear. OPS is not being revived. Witness a guaranteed retirement benefit through UPS if one chooses to opt for same. An employee must keep abreast of announcements from official sources, try to understand the terms of UPS, and stay informed about the benefits under both NPS and UPS to take an informed decision with regard to retirement planning.
Also Read: Government Gave Important Information On DA, It Is Important For Central Employees To Know